Connect with us

News

Summit for Democracy: Hypocrisy & Provocation.

Hamdhan Shakeel

Published

on

On 15th September 2021 U.S. President Joe Biden announced that it would be holding a Summit for Democracy on 09th December 2021. According to U.S. President Joe Biden, the summit will seek to bring the heads of world governments, civil societies and the private sector to “set forth an affirmative agenda for democratic renewal”.

From the onset, red flags were raised on the exact intended function of the summit as the U.S. provoked major global powers and democratic countries were left uninvited for the Summit for Democracy. China, Russia, Sri Lanka were among those who were not invited to the summit. Moreover the U.S. strategically provoked some of the nations which posed a threat to U.S. imperialism.

In the case of China, the U.S. invited Taiwan to the summit. Taiwan, which is an undeniably a part of China was invited to the summit in an act of provocation at a critical juncture as U.S. and its allies continue to threaten the stability of the region through their unwarranted military presence in the South China Sea. If we were to turn the tables around and analyze a hypothetical scenario where Russia were to invite Puerto Rico or Guam to a similar summit while blocking the U.S., they would retaliate with military action citing intimidation, provocation and the need to defend their territories.

Along with China, Russia and Sri Lanka, several other nations were also left uninvited for the summit, including countries like Bolivia and Venezuela where the U.S. has been accused of funding anti-government factions and meddling in domestic affairs.

The reason these democratic countries were left uninvited was due to the lack of democracy, or to be more precise for not meeting the definition of democracy by the U.S. This is in contrary to what U.S. President Joe Biden said on 15th February 20201, where he said that “No democracy is perfect, and no democracy is ever final. Every gain made, every barrier broken, is the result of determined, unceasing work.”.

While U.S. President Joe Biden claims that every democracy requires time to evolve to cater to its host country, the U.S. in practice does not adhere to this belief. The western nations which spent hundreds of years at war with each other and themselves, adopted their current democratic system through centuries of bloodshed. Now, laced with Eurocentricity the very same western nations demand the rest of the world to forgo their culture, history and social identify and to adopt their definitions of democracy overnight, or face economic sanctions or military action.

Just as the parliamentary democratic system under the monarchy is unsuitable for the U.S., the U.S.’ definition of democracy may be unsuitable for a nation halfway around the globe.

 Moreover, the U.S.’ monopolistic claim over democracy and its projection as the global defender and savior of democracy is questionable due to its historically backed fact that the U.S. has toppled more democratic governments than any other country and due to their weak internal democratic system.

According to Sweden’s International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA)1, democracy in the U.S. is regressing. They stated that there was visible deterioration of democracy in the U.S. including decline in civil liberties, increasing polarization, voter participation suppression. These factors have led to the U.S. people to even lose faith in their democratic system.

A recent study2 by the U.S. think tank Pew Research Center showed that amongst U.S. allies nations, only 17% saw the U.S. as an ideal democracy while only 19% of Americans believe that they are a model for democracy. While this shows the lack of faith in the system by both the American people and their allies, the study also revealed that 57% of their allies believe that U.S. democracy is in a state of regression.

As the U.S. President Joe Biden surrounds itself with autocrats like Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi    who has been accused of being engineering the decline of democracy in India and the rise of ethnocracy, the U.S. President Joe Biden’s Summit for Democracy is more akin to a global summit on hegemony and intimidation.

If the U.S. is sincere in their efforts to promote democracy, they should first and foremost address their undeniable domestic decline in the democratic system and its social fabric. Intimidation, provocation and hegemony will not pave way not promote democracy. As long as the U.S. continues to meddle with the natural evolution of the democracies around globe, the ideal democratic society for world nations will never be achieved.

1- https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/11/22/united-states-backsliding-democracies-list-first-time/

2- https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2021/11/01/what-people-around-the-world-like-and-dislike-about-american-society-and-politics/

World

Under professed ideals lies Washington’s pursuit of hegemony

FI

Published

on

By

Anyone familiar with U.S. history knows that Washington’s foreign and economic policies are often crafted to serve its own interests at the expense of others.

BEIJING, April 19 (Xinhua) — Beneath Washington’s veneer of lofty ideals and grandiose phrases championing economic globalization and free market principles lies a stark truth: These professed ideals serve merely as a convenient cover for its relentless pursuit of hegemony.

While concerns mount over U.S. government intrusions in business, such as the attempted forced sale of TikTok and the blocking of a Japanese firm’s takeover bid for U.S. Steel, anyone familiar with U.S. history knows that Washington’s foreign and economic policies are often crafted to serve its own interests at the expense of others.

Washington’s political elites denounced Donald Trump’s four years in office as a departure from the United States’ self-proclaimed role of “leading the world.” Though they spurned his “America First” banner like a pestilence, it embodies Washington’s approach to conducting business.

One such example is the Monroe Doctrine of 1823, which aimed to prevent European powers from interfering in the affairs of the Western Hemisphere. While framed as a policy to protect the sovereignty of newly independent Latin American nations, it only served to advance U.S. hegemony in the region.

Regarding trade, protectionist measures such as tariffs and trade barriers have been utilized throughout U.S. history to shield domestic industries and promote economic growth. For instance, the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 increased U.S. tariffs on agricultural imports and more than 20,000 imported goods and stifled global trade.

While the Trump administration was unabashed on its protectionist stance, the current U.S. administration has adopted a more covert but essentially similar approach, leveraging the concept of national security for its agenda.

The Biden administration’s relentless pursuit of weaponizing technology and economic matters against China, coupled with the U.S. campaigns of “de-risking” and “de-coupling” from China, also exposes Washington’s glaring hypocrisy in maintaining its hegemony.

Despite its longstanding rhetoric of advocating “free trade” in sectors where the U.S. holds dominance, Washington conveniently wields protectionist measures under the guise of national security in areas where its supremacy is challenged.

From using coercive tactics such as the Plaza Accord to counter Japan’s economic influence to implementing measures like extraterritorial jurisdiction to dismantle iconic French manufacturing company Alstom and continually finding pretexts to hurt competitive Chinese high-tech enterprises, Washington has long indulged in “dressed-up protectionism,” quickly abandoning the very free market principles it has professed to uphold.

These U.S. maneuvers reveal Washington’s adeptness at exploiting the so-called rules-based global order, which it helped establish, to serve its interests while brazenly advocating the law of the jungle wherein actions like plunder, deceit, coercion, extortion or even violent conquest are condoned.

By employing tactics reminiscent of a bygone era of colonialism and unchecked imperialism, the United States undermines the very foundations of the global order it claims to champion. The world cannot afford to ignore this ugly truth about Washington.

Source(s): Xinhua

Continue Reading

News

Maldives disheartened after US blocks Palestine’s UN membership

FI

Published

on

By

Maldives has expressed disheartenment after the United States blocked Palestine’s second attempt to become a full member of the United Nations (UN).

US vetoed the widely supported Palestine’s UN membership resolution at the UN Security Council during a vote on Thursday.

Maldivian Foreign Minister Moosa Zameer, in a post on X, said Maldives stands with more than 140 UN member states to support the Palestinian cause and their application to become admitted to the UN as a full member.

“It is imperative that the UN upholds its principles of justice and equality for all,” he stressed.

Minister Zameer also reaffirmed Maldives’ call for a just and lasting solution based on the establishment of an independent and sovereign State of Palestine based on the pre-1967 border.

Mohamed Naseer, the Principal Secretary at the President’s Office on Foreign Affairs, delivered Maldives’ statement at the UN Security Council meeting on Thursday.

Maldives, in the statement, called on the members of the United Nations; especially the permanent members of the UN Security Council to give their full and unconditional support for the admission of Palestine to the UN as a full member state.

Maldives also called on the UN Security Council to impose sanctions, including an arms embargo on Israel for violating the Charter of the Council on multiple occasions.

Thursday’s vote came more than six months into Israel’s military invasion in the besieged Palestinian territory that has left nearly 34,000 Palestinians dead — mostly babies, women and children — and wounded over 76,770.

Source(s): sun.mv

Continue Reading

News

President: In actuality, opposition wishes to overthrow the government

FI

Published

on

By

President Dr. Mohamed Muizzu states despite the opposition in actuality wishes to overthrow the government despite showcasing they want to hold the government accountable.

Speaking at the PPM-PNC campaign rally for the parliamentary election held in Fuvahmulah City on Thursday night – President Muizzu said although the opposition preaches about holding the government accountable, their inner desires are coming out now.

“The opposition talked about accountability before. Now, they are expressing what was in their hearts with respect to it. To change the government. To overthrow. To impeach. These kinds of terms,” he said.

Underscoring that everyone is aware this is a violation of the rules of democracy, President Muizzu appealed to the public to not allow for the nation to fall into this instability.

Refuting the opposition’s remarks regarding holding the government accountable, the President, described pro-government candidates as responsible and honest individuals. Therewith, he stressed that they would hold the government accountable for the sake of their constituents.

He added that it was PPM lawmakers who played the most crucial role in holding him accountable when he was housing minister during the PPM administration.

Similarly, he said pro-government candidates will undertake all efforts necessary within the parliament to defend the rights of their constituents, adding they would also cooperate with the government in matters concerning the rights of the constituents.

Speaking further, President Muizzu said the development desired by the people cannot be achieved if there is a parliament where the opposition MDP holds the majority.

On this note, he said there is no development that MDP can bring by having the parliament’s majority as the opposition which they failed to bring during the past five years when the party was ruling and held the parliament’s majority.

Source(s): sun.mv

Continue Reading

Trending